MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Fetal brain sparing in a mouse model of chronic maternal hypoxia

2017· article· en· W3171533435 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lindsay S. Cahill, Yuqing Zhou, Johnathan Hoggarth, Mike Seed, Christopher K. Macgowan, John G. Sled

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDuctus venosusFetusHypoxia (environmental)MedicineCerebral blood flowInternal medicineMiddle cerebral arteryCardiologyDuctus arteriosusBlood flowAnesthesiaPregnancyIschemiaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnancy complication may cause acute or chronic hypoxic stress to the fetus. The fetal response to acute hypoxia has been well characterized 1 and is associated with brain sparing, a mechanism by which more oxygenated blood is directed to the brain at the expense of organs such as the liver and the lungs 2–4 . In contrast, the fetal response to chronic hypoxia is not well understood. In the present study, Doppler ultrasound was used to characterize the fetal hemodynamic responses to chronic maternal hypoxia during late gestation in pregnant mice. Pregnant CD‐1 mice were randomly assigned to either a chronic hypoxia (n=13) (11% O 2 from gestational day E14.5 to E17.5) or control (n=13) group. Doppler ultrasound measurements were acquired at E17.5 (full term for CD‐1 dams is E18.5) of the middle cerebral artery, ductus venosus, main pulmonary artery, ductus arteriosus, and the umbilical artery. An acute hypoxic condition (8% O 2 for 3 minutes) was used to challenge the fetus and assess its capacity to compensate for additional hypoxia stress. Fetal organ growth was assessed using ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The fetuses exposed to chronic maternal hypoxia weighed 15% less than controls, indicating that the hypoxia‐exposed fetuses failed to reach their growth potential. Fetal cerebral blood flow was elevated by 31%, ductus venosus blood flow was 69% higher and pulmonary blood flow was decreased by 74% in the fetuses exposed to chronic hypoxia compared to controls. This demonstrates that the brain sparing response persists during chronic fetal hypoxia and is mediated by “streaming”, where highly oxygenated blood preferentially flows through the ductus venosus towards the cerebral circulation, bypassing the liver and the lungs. Consistent with these changes in blood flow, the brain volume is preserved while the lung and liver volumes decreased by 27 and 22% respectively in fetuses exposed to chronic hypoxia compared to controls. With an acute hypoxic challenge, the cerebral and ductus venosus blood flow increased in control fetuses. The elevated flow was achieved by an increased fetal heart rate and vasodilation. In contrast, the blood flow in the fetuses exposed to maternal hypoxia decreased when challenged. The decrease was accompanied by a drop in fetal heart rate, suggesting the fetus can no longer compensate for the decreased oxygen transport across the placenta. This highlights that fetuses exposed to chronic maternal hypoxia are at increased risk of fetal demise caused by an acute episode of hypoxia; for example, those that commonly occur during labour and delivery. Support or Funding Information Funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant MOP130403.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→