MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171582658 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.155402

Impact of nitrogen doping on the linear and nonlinear terahertz response of graphene

2021· preprint· en· W3171582658 on OpenAlexafffund
Roozbeh Anvari, E. Zaremba, Marc M. Dignam

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicChemical and Physical Properties of Materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationCompute Canada
KeywordsGrapheneTerahertz radiationDopingMaterials scienceDipoleCondensed matter physicsDensity functional theoryNonlinear systemNitrogenGraphene nanoribbonsChemical physicsNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsPhysicsChemistryComputational chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that impurities play a central role in the linear and nonlinear response of graphene at optical and terahertz frequencies. In this work, we calculate the bands and intraband dipole connection elements for nitrogen-doped monolayer graphene using a density functional tight-binding approach. Employing these results, we calculate the linear and nonlinear response of the doped graphene to terahertz pulses using a density-matrix approach in the length gauge. We present the results for the linear and nonlinear mobility as well as third-harmonic generation in graphene for adsorbed and substitutional nitrogen doping for a variety of doping densities. We show that the conduction bands are more parabolic in graphene structures with substitutional nitrogen doping than for those with adsorbed nitrogen. As a result, substitutional doping has a greater impact on the terahertz mobility and nonlinear response of graphene than adsorbed nitrogen does.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicChemical and Physical Properties of MaterialsFrench-language works237,207