MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171584720

L’action culturelle dans un contexte de réconciliation: L’agent·e d’interface comme allié·e à la résurgence.

2020· article· fr· W3171584720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabrielle Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet essai porte sur la collaboration avec les Peuples autochtones dans le milieu de l’action culturelle. Il fait suite à un stage chez l’organisme Exeko, situé à Montréal, qui utilise la philosophie et les arts afin de créer des espaces de rencontre, où le développement de l’esprit critique et de l'estime de soi sont au rendez-vous. Cette réflexion s’inscrit dans le contexte qui suit la publication du rapport de la Commission de vérité et réconciliation réalisée par le gouvernement fédéral afin de sensibiliser la population canadienne aux réalités des pensionnats autochtones. Les appels à l’action de la Commission tendent vers une autodétermination des Peuples autochtones, en plus d’affirmer l’importance d’une collaboration égalitaire entre les Peuples autochtones et les non autochtones. L’essai a pour objectif d’analyser les conditions de pratique des agent·e·s1 d’interface non-autochtones travaillant dans le milieu de l’action culturelle et d’outiller les organismes afin de mieux comprendre comment travailler avec les Peuples autochtones, et non pour eux, ni à leur place. Comment un organisme non-autochtone travaillant dans le champ de l’action culturelle peut-il se positionner comme allié afin de soutenir la résurgence? Quels sont les enseignements à retenir pour inspirer des actions adaptées aux besoins du milieu? En quoi la mobilisation et le transfert de connaissances peuvent-ils appuyer concrètement la résurgence, offrir des modèles d’action et avancer vers une transformation sociale des pratiques dans le milieu de l’action culturelle? Quel est le rôle de l’agent·e d’interface dans ce processus? Les pistes d’actions développées dans cet essai s'appliquent à toute personne ou tout organisme non autochtone souhaitant travailler en proximité avec les Peuples autochtones, et ce, afin de déconstruire les pratiques coloniales déjà en place. Plusieurs pistes de solution et d’action sont développées dans l’essai, notamment en ce qui concerne les compétences et habiletés souhaitées de la part de l’agent·e d’interface : la sensibilité, l’adaptabilité, la communication et l’aptitude aux rencontres. This essay examines types of collaboration with Indigenous Peoples in the field of cultural action. It follows an internship at Exeko, an organization based in Montreal who uses philosophy and art to create meeting spaces, where the development of critical thinking and of self-esteem is encouraged. The reflections of the essay are based on the release of the federal government’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which was created to inform Canadians of the realities of the Canadian residential schools. The Commission calls for collaborative action as equals from Nation to Nations and the respect of the right of self-determination for the Indigenous Peoples. The aim of this study is to analyze the qualities and abilities required for a knowledge broker working with Indigenous Peoples and how an organization can better understand how to work with them and not for them. That being said, how can a non-indigenous organization, in the field of culture, position itself as an ally in order to support the indigenous resurgence? How can the organization ensure the creation of collaborative projects in partnership with Indigenous Peoples, and not for them or in their place? What does it mean to be an ally as a cultural organization? How does the role of the knowledge broker fit with the resurgence of Indigenous Peoples? How can the knowledge mobilization, as well as the transfer concretely support the Indigenous resurgences, offer models of action and help move towards social transformation of our practices in the cultural fields? What is the role of the knowledge broker in that process? The courses of action developed in this essay apply to all non-indigenous individuals and organizations who are ready and willing to work in close proximity with the Indigenous Peoples, in order to deconstruct the colonial practices already in place.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.050
Scholarly communication0.0200.017
Open science0.0030.016
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique)Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207