MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The 26S proteasome binds and degrades Pih1 via the C‐terminal degron elements in yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>

2013· article· en· W3171586328 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexandr Paci, Xiaohu Liu, Banujan Balachandran, Rongmin Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDegronSaccharomyces cerevisiaeProteasomeHelicaseUbiquitinYeastBiologyCell biologyBiochemistryRibosomeProtein degradationProtein subunitRNAUbiquitin ligaseGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , R2TP complex is required for the box C/D small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein (snoRNP) assembly and ribosomal RNA processing. This complex is composed of Rvb1 and Rvb2, two ATP‐dependent DNA helicases, Tah1, an Hsp90 cofactor, and Pih1, a subunit that acts as a scaffold and likely regulates the Rvb1/Rvb2 helicase activities. We have previously shown that Rvb1 and Rvb2 bind to the N‐terminal fragment of Pih1, while Tah1 binds to the Pih1 C‐terminal fragment. Additionally, the C‐terminus of Pih1 acts as a degron that regulates Pih1 degradation in vivo and controls R2TP complex assembly. To understand the mechanism of Pih1 degradation in vivo, we purified Pih1 protein complex from yeast cells and immunoblotting analysis indicated that Pih1 is able to pull down some 26S proteasome subunits. In vitro binding assays indicated that Pih1 C‐terminal degron elements are likely to interact with 26S proteasome directly. Based on in vitro and in vivo degradation assay, we propose a model of proteasome dependent, but ubiquitin independent degradation of Pih1 in yeast cells. (This work is supported by a Connaught New Staff Matching Fund and an NSERC Discovery Grant to RZ)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicRNA modifications and cancer→French-language works237,207→