MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The tumor suppressor protein PDCD4 is a critical regulator of muscle cell differentiation

2013· article· en· W3171676234 on OpenAlexafffund
Olasunkanmi John Adegoke, Abdikarim Abdullahi, Amir Gilad, Naomi Maeda

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMyogenesisP70-S6 Kinase 1C2C12MyocytemTORC1Cell biologyMyosinBiologyCellular differentiationGene knockdownMyostatinSkeletal muscleChemistrySignal transductionApoptosisPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayEndocrinologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1/S6 ribosomal protein kinase 1 (mTORC1/S6K1) pathway is a critical regulator of mRNA translation and skeletal muscle mass. It does this in part by inhibiting the tumor suppressor protein, programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4). In C2C12 and L6 muscle cells, we showed that PDCD4 abundance was high on day 1 and then decreased as myoblasts differentiated into myotubes (p<0.05). siRNA‐mediated knockdown of S6K1 reversed the decrease in PDCD4 abundance and significantly decreased myosin heavy chain 1 (MHC 1) protein abundance, suggesting that PDCD4 regulation was vital for differentiation. Indeed, cells depleted of PDCD4 had reduced MHC abundance, showed delayed myoblast fusion and abnormal myotube formation. On days 3 and 4 of differentiation, myotubes depleted of PDCD4 showed 40–60% reductions in myotube protein synthesis. This study unravels a link between PDCD4 and muscle cell differentiation, and suggests that this mTORC1/S6K1 substrate may be of therapeutic significance for muscle recovery following injury or atrophy. Funded by NSERC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→