Mocarabe: High-Performance Time-Multiplexed Overlays for FPGAs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coarse-grained reconfigurable array (CGRA) overlays can improve dataflow kernel throughput by an order of magnitude over Vivado HLS. This is possible with a combination of carefully floorplanned high-frequency (645-768 MHz) design and a scalable, communication-aware compiler. Our 2D torus CGRA architecture supports versatile processing element (PE) functionality and a configurable number of communication channels to match application demands. Compared to recent FPGA overlays like CGRA-ME's ADRES and HyCUBE implementations, our design operates at 1.8-3.4× faster clock frequency, while scaling to an orders-of-magnitude larger array size of 19×69 on Xilinx Alveo U280. Our communication-aware compiler targets HLS objectives such as initiation interval (II) and minimizes communication cost using an integer linear programming (ILP) formulation. Unlike SDC schedulers in FPGA HLS tools, we treat data movement as a first-class citizen by encoding the space and time resources communication network of the overlay in the ILP formulation. Given the same constraints on operational resources as Vivado HLS, we can retain our target II and achieve up to 9.2× higher frequency. Our ILP scheduler outperforms a PathFinder space-time router implementation in quality of result by up to nearly 2×.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it