MEDIA WARAGA SEBAGAI UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR DALAM MENGIDENTIFIKASI KERAGAMAN BUDAYA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to describe the enhancement of elementary school students ' ability to identify cultural diversity, as well as describe the improvement of basic skills teaching teachers through the application of Waraga media.The research method used is a class action research conducted as many as 2 cycles. Each cycle is implemented during 2 meetings. Cycles consist of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The subject of the study was 28 graders of SD Negeri 2 Pecangaan Wetan in Lesson 2019/2020. The technique of data collection during the implementation of class action research using test techniques in the form of evaluation test to know the improvement of students ' ability to identify cultural diversity, and nontest technique in the form of observation of teacher teaching basic skills using observation sheet consisting of 8 observed aspects. Data analysis used is quantitative and qualitative data analysis. The results showed that with the use of the media waraga in learning occurs increase the ability of students in identifying cultural diversity in elementary schools. Proven from the increasing percentage of the classical dictancy. Cycle I gained a percentage of 68% and cycle II gained 86%. The results also showed improved teacher teaching basic skills, proven from observations that gained a score percentage of 77.3% on the I cycle and increased to 85% in cycle II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it