Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract End-Permian mass extinction is the largest bio-crises in the past 542 million years in Earth's history. Despite half a century of study, what caused the catastrophe remains equivocal. Fossil collections in the study area of Bayan Har, NW China, suggest a continuous Permian sequence, whereas most mid-to-upper Permian strata were missing. By correlating the Permian sequence reconstructed from reworked carbonate clasts with the measured Permian section, we corroborate a sea-level fall of at least 354 m caused by plume-induced uplift, resulted in the erosion of the last 15-Myr Permian carbonate strata, from Uppermost Permian to the fusulinid zone. The marine regression and resultant erosion occurred not only in China but also in Canadian Arctica[1], Oman[2], Canadian Rockies[3], Norway[3], North America[3] all over the world. New sections and digitalized sea-level regression demonstrate that the period of extinction falls within the hiatus, a break in deposition between the uppermost Permian carbonate strata and the clasts reworked from Permian platforms, representing a duration of sea-level drop 354 m. Carbonate clasts, Siberian Traps volcanism, global warming, anoxia, and ocean acidification are all post-extinction geological events. Why did the extinction occur during the falling stage? We will never know because we can't study a hiatus unrepresented by strata unless we associate the extinction with the sea-level drop.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".