MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3171773168 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-510

Improvements to the Simplified Level 2 Prototype Processor for Retrieving Canopy Biophysical Variables from Sentinel 2 Multispectral Instrument Data

2021· article· en· W3171773168 on OpenAlexaffabout
Richard Fernandes, Frédéric Baret, Luke A. Brown, Francis Canisius, Jadunandan Dash, Najib Djamai, Gang Hong, Camryn MacDougall, Hemit Shah, Marie Weiss, Detang Zhong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanopyComputer scienceMultispectral imageEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingBiologyArtificial intelligenceBotanyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sentinel 2 (S2) constellation mission was designed to facilitate the systematic mapping canopy biophysical variables at medium resolution on a global basis and in a free and open manner. The mission concept requires the development of downstream services to map variables such as the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR), fraction of canopy cover (fCOVER) and leaf area index (LAI) using Level 2A surface reflectance inputs from the S2 ground segment. Currently, free and open products generation can be performed using the Simplified Level 2 Prototype Processor (SL2P) applied on a product granule basis. Considering that the processor is a prototype this study addresses three questions: 1) Can the SL2P algorithm, or subsequent versions, be engineered to facilitate systematic product generation over large extents in a free and open manner? 2) What is the uncertainty of SL2P products over North America during the growing season? 3) Can the uncertainty be reduced by changing the calibration database used within SL2P? To facilitate validation and product generation, SL2P was ported to a Google Earth Engine application (the Landscape Evolution and Forecasting Toolbox). This now allows mapping of up to one million square kilometers in near real time using either the original SL2P algorithm or updated versions. SL2P uncertainty was quantified over North America using direct comparison to 20 in-situ sites within the National Environmental Observing Network in the continental United States of America and within a Canada wide field campaign over forests and shrublands conducted by Canada Centre for Remote Sensing. SL2P outputs were also compared to MODIS and Copernicus Global Land Service products over the Belmanip II regional sites and 30 additional forested regions in North America. Results from NEON validation indicate SL2P is generally within uncertainty requirements except for forests; where it underestimates fAPAR, fCOVER and LAI. Results for other sites will also be presented. To address the forest bias, SL2P was recalibrated using simulations from the FLIGHT 3D radiative transfer model representative of North American forests. The uncertainty of the recalibrated SL2P algorithm will be compared to baseline SL2P estimates to determine if increased model complexity is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing in Agriculture→French-language works237,207→