MO611CARDIOPULMONARY RESERVE EXAMINED WITH CARDIOPULMONARY EXERCISE TESTING IN INDIVIDUALS WITH AND WITHOUT CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) often present with reduced physical activity and exercise performance due to a number of factors relevant to co-existing disturbances of the cardiac, nervous and muscular systems. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely applied in daily clinical practice used for clinical evaluation of exercise intolerance and related symptoms (i.e. dyspnea, fatigue), as well risk stratification, and other applications in several medical fields. Method This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies which used CPET technology in adult patients with CKD to examine cardiopulmonary reserve in individuals with versus individuals without CKD. The primary outcome was peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak). Literature search involved PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases; manual search of article references and of grey literature was also performed. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to evaluate the quality of retrieved studies. Results From an initial 4944 literature records, we identified 29 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria; of these, 25 studies with complete data including 2213 participants were included in final meta-analysis. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was significantly lower in CKD patients compared to controls without CKD (standardized-mean-difference, SMD:-1.40, 95%CI[-1.68, -1.13]) (Figure). Oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold (VO2AT) (SMD:-1.06, 95%CI[-1.34, -0.79]), maximum workload (weighted-mean-difference, WMD:-58.26, 95%CI[-74.14, -42.38]) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (WMD:-0.02, 95%CI[-0.05, 0.01]) were also impaired in CKD patients compared to non-CKD individuals. In 3 studies comparing patients with CKD versus patients with heart failure without CKD VO2peak was higher in the former (WMD:6.60, 95%CI[3.02, 10.18]). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. Conclusion VO2peak and other commonly analyzed CPET variables were lower in CKD patients compared to controls, indicating reduced functional cardiopulmonary reserve in the former. In contrast, CKD patients performed better when compared patients with heart failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.017 | 0.036 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".