MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effects of of disease‐causing DVL1 mutations on chondrogenesis in chicken limb mesenchyme

2021· article· en· W3171874925 on OpenAlexafffund
Kywana Bonaparte, Joy M. Richman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChondrogenesisDishevelledWnt signaling pathwayPhenotypeBiologyCell biologyMesenchymeEctopic expressionFrizzledGeneticsSignal transductionGeneEmbryoStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robinow syndrome (RS) is a rare skeletal dysplasia characterized by skeletal phenotypes affecting the face and limbs. The majority of autosomal dominant RS patients (DRS) have mutations in Dishevelled‐1 (DVL1) (OMIM#1807000) and Dishevelled‐3 (DVL3) (OMIM#616894). DVL is a cytoplasmic phosphoprotein that transduces WNT(Wingless‐related) signals. Any type of WNT signaling that involves Frizzled receptor binding also requires the binding of DVL to activate signaling. All RS DVL1 variants have frameshift mutations in exon 14 that produce an abnormal peptide that is over 200 amino acids long. . This peptide replaces the entire C‐terminus and removes respective binding partners. It is not possible to predict whether this peptide causes a loss‐ gain‐of‐function or whether there may be novel functions. Previous in vivo studies in our lab showed that the ectopic expression of wtDVL did not affect the overall shape of the cartilage and limbs contained closely packed differentiated chondrocytes. The phenotypes of the variants were very different to wtDVL1 but similar to each other. There were pockets of undifferentiated fibroblasts between areas of differentiated chondrocytes thus shape was very irregular. These phenotypes were not providing clear answers as to which steps of chondrogenesis are affected. Our objective is to misexpress RS h DVL1 variants ( DVL1 1519 D T , DVL1 1529 D G , DVL1 1615 D A ) and wtDVL1 in cells isolated from the limb bud and then assess the effect on different stages of chondrogenesis. High density micromass cultures were created from stage 24 chicken limb mesenchyme, infected with viruses and grown for 4, 6 or 8 days of culture. Cultures were photographed and the proportion of the culture occupied by cartilage was determined. Two‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post‐hoc test for multiple comparisons was carried out. All cultures formed nodules stained with Alcian blue by 4 days of culture. Then differences appeared. The GFP controls continued to differentiate into cartilage and there was a significant increased over the 8 day experimental period. The wtDVL1 started out similar to GFP but then chondrogenesis gradually decreased. By 8‐days there was significantly less cartilage than at 4 days in wtDVL1‐infected cultures. Two of the RS DVL1 variants stimulated chondrogenesis significantly compared to GFP and wtDVL1 by 8 days of culture (1519 and 1529). This indicates RS DVL1 variants caused a gain‐of‐function on chondrogenesis. In contrast, the 1615 variant failed to induce cartilage beyond the amount present at 4 days. This seems like the 1615 variant allowed the initial chondrogenesis to take place but then failed to support further differentiation. This unique phenotype could mean that there are interesting effects on downstream transcription of genes. that may indicate signalling differences for this particular variant. In conclusion DVL1 does not play a role in the initial condensation of cartilage but is regulating differentiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer→French-language works237,207→