MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Nivolumab/ipilimumab primed immunotransplant in post-CAR-T and post-ASCT DLBCL.

2021· article· en· W3171995199 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bailey G. Fitzgerald, Thomas U. Marron, Dana Ostrowski, Jonah Shulman, Matko Kalac, Netonia Marshall, Joshua Brody

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBristol-Myers Squibb Canada
KeywordsMedicineIpilimumabFludarabineNivolumabNeutropeniaInternal medicineCyclophosphamideProgressive diseaseChemotherapyRefractory (planetary science)OncologyGastroenterologyImmunotherapyCancerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2593 Background: Patients with refractory diffuse large b cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have poor outcomes with < 30% surviving for 12 months and especially poor outcomes for those who progress after chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) or autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). These therapies utilize lymphodepleting chemotherapy which induces homeostatic T cell proliferation. We have demonstrated these expanding T cells express high levels of PD1 and CTLA4. In pre-clinical models, addition of dual checkpoint blockade (DCB) with anti-PD1/anti-CTLA-4 to adoptive T cell transfer after lymphodepletion achieved a synergistic anti-tumor effect. Based on these studies, we developed a phase Ib/II study of Nivolumab/Ipilimumab primed “immunotransplant” for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL (NCT03305445). Methods: Phase Ib of the trial enrolled 6 patients with progressive disease following at least one line of standard therapy. Patients received two cycles of DCB with ipilimumab (1mg/kg) and nivolumab (3mg/kg) given at three-week intervals followed by immunotransplant (i.e. peripheral blood T cell harvest, lymphodepletion with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide, T cell reinfusion), followed by two further cycles of DCB and nivolumab maintenance. Results: Five patients received at least two cycles of DCB and the autologous T cell transfer, while one patient had progressive disease during initial DCB and required salvage chemotherapy. Treatment emergent AE (TEAE) occurred in 100% of patients. As expected with lymphodepleting chemotherapy, the most common TEAE were neutropenia (66.7% grade 1, 66.7% grade ≥ 3), fatigue (83.3%, 16.7%), fever (66.7%, 0%), and dyspnea (66.7%, 0.0%). One patient (16.7%) died during the intervention period (grade 5 TEAE), though relation to study drug is unclear. Three patients (50.0%) experienced clinical benefit with immunotransplant. One patient (a 58yo M with progression after seven lines of therapy including ASCT and CAR-T) is experiencing partial metabolic response after 4 months on protocol. One 77yo F with multiple prior lines of therapy including ASCT has experienced an extended complete metabolic response, currently 31 months post immunotransplant. A third (a 50yo F) experienced mixed radiographic response, and has not received subsequent therapy 30 months following immunotransplant. Conclusions: Nivolumab/Ipilimumab primed immunotransplant is well tolerated in patients with R/R DLBCL for whom there are few treatment options. Preliminary results demonstrate remissions in heavily pre-treated patients, including prior ASCT and CAR-T. Pre-clinical models in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and T cell lymphoma all demonstrate synergy when DCB is administered with lymphodepletion and autologous T cell transfer. These data support further investigation of DCB-primed immunotransplant. Clinical trial information: NCT03305445.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→