MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172037210

Effective Leadership in Counter-Insurgency: The North-West Mounted Police in South Africa, 1899-1902

2008· article· en· W3172037210 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kenneth Grad

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuerrilla warfareInsurgencyCitizen journalismVictoryBattlefieldPower (physics)AdversaryPolitical scienceLawHistoryPoliticsAncient history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A clear trend has emerged in military literature focusing on leadership for the battlefield. This supposedly new battlefield is characterized by, among other things, the absence of an identifiable front, a polymorphous enemy, and the lack of a clear, decisive moment of victory. This necessitates strong leadership to maintain unit cohesion and morale under demanding circumstances. In line with this trend, the Canadian Forces has placed particular focus on the leadership qualities integral to success in modern warfare. Modern war, however, is synonymous with small war, at least according to the definition employed by the Chief of Defence Staff. Accordingly, the prevalence of guerrilla combat and counter-insurgency throughout the history of warfare underscores the importance of learning from the past. This paper presents a case study of North-West Mounted Police (NWMP) participation in the South African War (Boer War), 1899-1902. The bulk of the NWMP contribution took place within two units, the Canadian Mounted Rifles (CMR) and Lord Strathcona’s Horse (LSH). The role of the NWMP in both units was to counter the guerrilla operations used by the South Africans to frustrate the larger, slower British army throughout the early stages of the war. Both the CMR and LSH, led primarily by NWMP officers, achieved considerable success. The analytical approach employed in this study borrows from the Canadian Forces Leadership Institute manual entitled Leadership in the CF: Conceptual Foundations, published in 2005. This model operates under the assumption that leaders possess two main bases from which to draw their social power: position and personal. This study argues that, in the military, personal power is of much greater importance to leadership than position power. NWMP officers in South Africa possessed high amounts of personal power, attributing to their overall success. Moreover, the officers of the LSH and CMR continually displayed two important components of personal power vital to small unit combat: expert and referent power. Expert and referent power are particularly relevant to the stressful nature of counter-insurgency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207