MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3172106966 · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2021-bcs.158

161 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography in acute aortic syndrome

2021· article· en· W3172106966 on OpenAlexaff
Maaz Syed, Alexander J. Fletcher, Samuel Debono, Rachael O. Forsythe, Michelle C. Williams, Marc R. Dweck, Adriana Tavares, Mark G. MacAskill, Anoop Shah, Martin A. Denvir, Kelvin Lim, William Wallace, Jakub Kaczynski, Tim Clark, Stephanie Sellers, Neil Masson, Orwa Falah, R.T.A. Chalmers, Andrew L. Tambyraja, Edwin J.R. van Beek, David E. Newby

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePositron emission tomographySodium fluorideNuclear medicineRadiologyFluoride

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Acute aortic syndrome is a catastrophic condition characterised by medial degeneration and cellular destruction within the aortic wall. 18F-Sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) detects microscopic calcification as a marker of disease activity. This proof-of-concept study aims characterise 18F-NaF PET in patients with acute aortic syndrome. Methods Aortic tissue obtained from patients with acute aortic syndrome was stained using von Kossa’s stain for calcium-phosphate complexes and then exposed to 18F-sodium fluoride to confirm radiotracer binding to microcalcification. Next, patients with aortic dissection or intramural haematomas and healthy controls underwent 18F-NaF PET/CT and CT angiography of the aorta. A threshold of 12 weeks since diagnosis was used to classify patients to ‘recent’ or ‘prior’ acute aortic syndrome groups. Peak aortic 18F-NaF uptake was corrected for background blood pool activity to obtain a most-diseased segment tissue-to-background ratio (MDS TBRmax). Radiotracer binding was compared with aortic size in a linear regression model and major adverse aortic events (aortic rupture, aorta-related death or aortic repair) in a proportional hazards Cox survival analysis. Results Aortic 18F-NaF uptake co-localized with histologically defined regions of microcalcification (n=15). Patients with acute aortic syndrome had increased 18F-NaF binding compared to healthy controls (TBRmax 2.02±0.42 (n=47) vs 1.36±0.39 (n=20) respectively, p<0.001). Peak radiotracer uptake occurred at the site of intimal disruption (+27.5% compared to the proximal aorta, p<0.001). 18F-NaF binding to the false lumen was associated with aortic growth (+7.1 mm/yr, p=0.011) and uptake in the outer aortic wall was associated with major adverse aortic events (hazard ratio 8.6 [95% CI, 1.1-68.1], p=0.041) in patients with recent acute aortic syndrome. Conclusion 18F-NaF PET/CT uptake was increased in patients with acute aortic syndrome at sites of disease activity. Radiotracer binding was associated with aortic growth and clinical events. 18F-NaF PET-CT holds promise as a non-invasive marker of disease severity and future risk in patients with acute aortic syndrome. Conflict of Interest None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches→French-language works237,207→