MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3172130898 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab073.122

DOP83 Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis Through 3 Years: UNIFI Long-term Extension

2021· article· en· W3172130898 on OpenAlexaff
María T. Abreu, Silvio Danese, William J. Sandborn, Yi Miao, Ilia Tikhonov, H Zhang, Remo Panaccione, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Ellen Scherl, Rupert W. Leong, David Rowbotham, Ramesh Arasaradnam, Waqqas Afif, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, B E Sands, Colleen Marano

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUstekinumabRandomized controlled trialPopulationUlcerative colitisMaintenance therapyPlaceboInternal medicineIntention-to-treat analysisRandomizationSurgeryClinical endpointChemotherapyDiseaseAdalimumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is an IL-12/23p40 antagonist used to treat pts with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The ongoing UNIFI long-term extension (LTE) evaluates subcutaneous (SC) 90mg UST maintenance therapy, with efficacy (wk152) and safety (wk156) results reported here. Methods 523 intravenous UST induction responders were randomized to SC maintenance therapy (175 SC placebo [PBO]; 172 UST 90mg every 12 weeks [q12w]; 176 UST 90mg q8w). 284 UST pts who completed wk44 entered the LTE. PBO pts were discontinued after wk44 unblinding. Starting at wk56, randomized pts with UC worsening could adjust to q8w. Symptomatic remission (Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0) was evaluated in randomized pts. Safety was evaluated for all 588 pts treated in the LTE, including the randomized and nonrandomized populations; 188 received PBO and 457 received UST. The nonrandomized population included responders to PBO induction and UST induction nonresponders at wk8 who received SC UST, responded 8 wks later and received UST 90mg q8w. Results Among all pts randomized to UST at maintenance baseline (intent-to-treat population with nonresponder imputation for missing data and treatment failure criteria), 55.2% were in symptomatic remission at wk152 (biologic naïve, 66.1%; biologic failures, 43.5%; Table 1); 96.4% (185/192) of pts in symptomatic remission at wk152 were corticosteroid-free. Overall, 20.1% (39/149 biologic failure, 16/149 biologic naïve) of pts who were randomized to UST and treated in the LTE discontinued treatment between wks44 and 156. Among randomized pts treated with UST in the LTE, 67.6% were in symptomatic remission at wk152; 76.4% of those in clinical remission at wk44 were in symptomatic remission at wk152; and 84.1% of pts with observed data at wk152 were in symptomatic remission. From maintenance wk0-156, combined UST and PBO pts had 1281.6 and 425.0 pt-years of follow-up, respectively; and safety events per 100 pt-years of follow-up for combined UST vs PBO were AEs: 235.81 vs 204.48, SAEs: 7.73 vs 7.53, and serious infections: 2.34 vs 2.35 (Table 2). From wks96-156, there were no reported deaths or major adverse cardiovascular events. One UST-treated pt with fair skin and a prior history of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) reported 2 BCC. One 90 mg q8w UST pt receiving concomitant 6-MP reported SAEs of neutropenic sepsis and oral herpes SAE; the latter events were considered potential opportunistic infections. The dose of 6-MP was reduced, pt recovered and continued UST. Conclusion The efficacy of UST in pts with UC was sustained through 3 years. No new safety signals were observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→