MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172201447 · doi:10.2478/rp-2020-0015

From Idea to Presentation to Publication. Papers of the Forum of Young Pedagogues at the Pedagogical Sciences Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences

2020· article· en· W3172201447 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Czerepaniak-Walczak, Ewa Bochno

Bibliographic record

VenueYearbook of Pedagogy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Quarter (Canadian coin)SociologyWork (physics)Library scienceMedia studiesEngineeringHistoryComputer scienceArchaeologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The aim of the article is to introduce / recall the idea of Prof. Maria Dudzikowa, who for a quarter of a century was the head of the Summer Schools of Young Pedagogues at KNP PAN, what is and what role does the work on the Forum of Young Pedagogues as an experience in writing scientific texts and editing collective works.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0180.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1740.101

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYearbook of PedagogySame topicEducation and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207