La negociación de las relaciones futuras entre el Reino Unido y la Unión Europea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl Reino Unido y la Union Europea estan negociando como seran sus relaciones futuras, tras la retirada del primero de la organizacion internacional y la entrada en vigor del Acuerdo de salida. Aunque cabian otras interpretaciones, la Union impuso su exegesis del art. 50 TUE de que los dos acuerdos debian ser sucesivos. Inicialmente habia multiples alternativas sobre la configuracion de su relacion, pero las partes han consensuado que se tratara de un acuerdo de libre comercio. Tambien pactaron una Declaracion politica a finales de octubre del 2019, que deberia ser el paradigma del pacto final. Sin embargo, las negociaciones evidencian que existen varias discrepancias importantes, como la utilizacion del Acuerdo Economico y Comercial Global con Canada como referente, la lealtad en la competencia, la pesca, la cooperacion judicial y policial en materia penal, asi como la interpretacion y aplicacion del acuerdo. EnglishThe United Kingdom and the European Union are negotiating their future relation, after the withdrawal of the former from the international organization and the entry into force of the Exit Agreement. Although other interpretations were possible, the Union imposed its understanding of Article 50 TEU that the two agreements should be successive. Initially there were multiple alternatives on the configuration of their relationship, but the parties have agreed that it will be a free trade agreement. They also agreed to a political Declaration in late October 2019, which should be the paradigm of the final agreement. However, the negotiations show that there are several key disagreements, as the use of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with Canada as a model, fair competition, fishing opportunities, law enforcement and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, and governance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".