MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172325341 · doi:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgab023

Anterior cingulate cortex and ventral tegmental area activity during cost-benefit decision-making following maternal immune activation

2021· article· en· W3172325341 on OpenAlexaff
Eloise Croy, Thomas W. Elston, David K. Bilkey

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHealth Research Council of New Zealand
KeywordsVentral tegmental areaAnterior cingulate cortexCortex (anatomy)NeuroscienceCingulate cortexPsychologyCentral nervous systemCognitionDopamine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Schizophrenia is associated with deficits in memory, behavioural flexibility, and motivation, which can result in difficulties in decision-making. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) are two brain regions that are involved in decision-making, and display dysfunction in schizophrenia. We investigated ACC and VTA activity in the maternal immune activation (MIA) model of a schizophrenia risk factor. Control and MIA rats completed a cost-benefit decision-making task in a continuous T-maze, choosing between a high cost and high reward (HCHR), and a low cost and low reward (LCLR), option. A choice reversal occurred halfway through each session. Single unit activity in the ACC and local field potentials (LFPs) in the VTA were monitored. Overall, MIA and control rats made a similar proportion of HCHR and LCLR choices across the whole recording session, suggesting similar levels of motivation. However, MIA rats made different decisions than controls during periods of increased uncertainty. This appeared to reflect memory deficits and behavioural inflexibility. MIA animals displayed an increase in ACC activity associated with cost, an increase in synchrony of ACC neurons to the VTA theta oscillation, and a decrease in coherence in the delta frequency between the ACC and VTA. These changes suggest that MIA animals may be biased towards focussing on the cost rather than the benefits of the task, a change also seen in schizophrenia. Here, however, the MIA animals may be able to increase motivation to maintain behaviour despite this change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia Bulletin OpenSame topicMemory and Neural MechanismsFrench-language works237,207