MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172403079 · doi:10.3390/math9121327

Distributed State Estimation Based Distributed Model Predictive Control

2021· article· en· W3172403079 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsObserver (physics)Control theory (sociology)Bounded functionComputer scienceState (computer science)EstimationState observerProcess (computing)Distributed element modelNoise (video)Control (management)AlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we consider output-feedback distributed model predictive control (DMPC) based on distributed state estimation with bounded process disturbances and output measurement noise. Specifically, a state estimation scheme based on observer-enhanced distributed moving horizon estimation (DMHE) is considered for distributed state estimation purposes. The observer-enhanced DMHE ensures that the state estimates of the system reach a small neighborhood of the actual state values quickly and then maintain within the neighborhood. This implies that the estimation error is bounded. Based on the state estimates provided by the DMHE, a DMPC algorithm is developed based on Lyapunov techniques. In the proposed design, the DMHE and the DMPC are evaluated synchronously every sampling time. The proposed output DMPC is applied to a simulated chemical process and the simulation results show the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed distributed estimation and control approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it