MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172460504

Partition Of India: A Boon Or Curse, With Special Reference To Women Struggle In Deepa Mehta’s Film 1947: Earth

2021· article· en· W3172460504 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abhinanda Das

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Cinema and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartition (number theory)CurseColonialismNationalismGender studiesSociologyHistoryPolitical scienceAnthropologyLawPoliticsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nationalism in India had grown as a form of movement which was fought against British colonialism for independence and power. However, the views on the country’s partition are ambivalent. Deepa Mehta, an Indo- Canadian film director and screenwriter has reflected the condition of India during the pre- partition and partition phase. The movie 1947: Earth was released in 1998, reminding the bloodiest history of India. The religious sentiment has been played as a trump card by the British colonizers resulting to bloodshed among the common people. The decision of the colonizers to divide British India into two parts India and Pakistan has ended up with bloodshed, dislocation and boundaries. Therefore, the paper describes the partition scenario of India and its aftermath through the film “1947: Earth” by Deepa Mehta. It also reflects the condition of women who had to face two battles, one with the colonizers and the other with their own society. The theory of new historicism, feminism and Bhabha’s theory of otherness are to be applied here. Along with all these, the paper will showcase the eminent role of women both as a victim and a powerful one during the time of partition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0230.014
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative ResearchSame topicSouth Asian Cinema and CultureFrench-language works237,207