Evolution of Mid‐latitude Density Irregularities and Scintillation in North America During the 7–8 September 2017 Storm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Using the University Navstar Consortium (UNAVCO) Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver network in North America, we present 2‐D distributions of GPS radio signal scintillation in the mid‐latitude ionosphere during the 7–8 September 2017 storm. The mid‐latitude ionosphere showed a variety of density structures such as the storm enhanced density (SED) base and plume, main trough, secondary plume, and secondary trough during the storm main and early recovery phases. Enhanced phase and amplitude scintillation indices were observed at the density gradients of those structures. SuperDARN radar echoes were also enhanced at the density gradients. The collocation of the scintillation and HF radar echoes indicates that density irregularities developed across a wide range of wavelengths (tens of meters to tens of kilometers) in the mid‐latitude density structures. The density gradients and irregularities were also detected by Swarm and DMSP as in‐situ density structures that disturbed the GPS signals. The irregularities were a substantial fraction (∼10%–50%) of the background density. The density irregularity had a power law spectrum with slope of ∼ −1.8, suggesting that gradient drift instability (GDI) contributed to turbulence formation. Both high‐latitude and low‐latitude processes likely contributed to forming the mid‐latitude density structures, and the mid‐latitude scintillation occurred at the interface of high‐latitude and low‐latitude forcing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".