Social Changes of Traditional Rules in Facing Contemporary Developments: A Sociological Study of Intercaste Marriagein Balinese Society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, it is important to examine the impetus for changes of traditional rules in facing contemporary developments and in this regard, this study took a private subject of rules on inter-caste marriage in the Balinese Hindu community. In this context, this study aims to investigate how the inter-caste marriage system is run as an effort to bridge traditional values and modern values based on legal equality and citizenship by taking Balinese society. This research is empirical research with a historical approach with the object of the research is inter-caste marriages. The results showed that the development of inter-caste marriage rules in the monarchy period was derived from Hindu law. The rules on inter-caste marriage during the colonial period can be found in the Peswara and after the independence, the inter-caste marriage is regulated in the Decree of House of Representative of Bali Province, Bhisama Sabha Pandita, and the Decree of MDP Bali. The Hindu community still maintains the sanctions against inter-caste marriage because of their adherence to the customary law of the traditional village.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".