MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Health disparity in Honduras: evaluation of growth status in children ages 6–60 months compared to mother's body mass index

2013· article· en· W3173025327 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emily L Endres, Teresa M. Kemmer, Miguel Coello

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDiagnostic Services ManitobaU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsUnderweightOverweightBody mass indexMedicineDemographyMalnutritionStunted growthStandard scoreObesitySocioeconomic statusPediatricsEnvironmental healthPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Honduras, one in four children suffer from malnutrition. The purpose was to determine if growth parameters are associated with socioeconomic status and the mother's body mass index (BMI). Height and weight were obtained from randomly selected children in this cross‐sectional study of 53 children ages 6–60 months and their mothers living in Montaña de la Flor, Honduras. In children, stunted was defined as height‐for‐age <−2 z‐score (HAZ), wasted as weight‐for‐height <−2 z‐score (WHZ), and underweight as weight‐for‐age <−2 z‐score (WAZ). Mother's BMI was defined as underweight <18.5, normal 18.5–24.99, overweight 25–29.99, obese ≥30 and stunting in the mother as height <145 cm. Prevalence of children stunted was 53%; wasted 6%, and underweight 40%. Mother's prevalence was overweight 22%, obese 4% and stunted 30%. Mother's BMI was not significantly associated with children's growth parameters. Of the mother‐child pairs evaluated (n=46) when the mother's BMI was ≥ 25, 15% had a child that was stunted, 13% underweight and none wasted. Significant associations were found between WAZ and telephone ownership, piped water, type of roofing and household food security (child having no breakfast, eating less and going hungry, decreased access to food, and adult going hungry). Grant Funding Source : USDA NIFA Competitive Grant 2011 67002 30202 and USDA, SD Agricultural Experiment Station Grant SD00H249–08.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicChild Nutrition and Water Access→French-language works237,207→