MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173155271 · doi:10.1186/s13223-021-00563-0

Psychosocial burden of type 1 and 2 hereditary angioedema: a single-center Canadian cohort study

2021· article· en· W3173155271 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Julia Hews‐Girard, M. Dawn Goodyear

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
FundersCSL Behring
KeywordsPsychosocialMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)AnxietyDASSCohortDepression (economics)PsychiatryClinical psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare but serious disorder associated with a multifaceted burden of illness including a high prevalence of psychiatric symptoms and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Despite recent efforts to clarify the psychosocial implications of HAE, important gaps still remain. The aim of this study was to characterize the psychosocial burden associated with HAE types 1 and 2. METHODS: Type 1 or 2 HAE patients (n = 17), aged 19 years or older, completed the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the DSM-5 cross cutting measures to identify psychiatric symptomatology, Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) and the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) to assess disease-related and generic HRQoL respectively, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) to measure impact on work productivity and daily activities. Data analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (Version 25.0; IBM, Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize continuous demographics and clinical characteristics and outcomes of interest while frequency distributions were used for categorical variables. T tests were used to compare SF-36v2 domain scores to Canadian norms and sex differences in scale scores. RESULTS: Depression [DASS-21 score = 6.8 ± 10.2; n = 12 (71%)] anxiety [DASS-21 score = 6.2 ± 8.2; n = 13 (76%)] and stress [DASS-21 score = 10 ± 10.2; n = 13 (76%)] were prevalent. Other psychiatric symptoms warranting inquiry included mania (n = 14, 82.4%), anger (n = 14, 82.4%), sleep disturbances (n = 13, 76.5%), somatic symptoms (n = 11, 64.7%) and impaired personality functioning (n = 9, 52.9%). Mean AE-QoL score was 39 ± 18.2. Mean SF-36v2 domain scores were significantly lower than Canadian normative data for the entire sample (p < 0.05). Impairment in work productivity was minimal; mean activity impairment was 20.6% ± 21.1% [n = 11 (64.7%)]. Female participants reported significantly greater HAE-related stress [DASS; t(15) = - 2.2, p = 0.04], greater HAE-related fears [AEQoL; t(5.6) = - 2.7, p = 0.04), and lower SF-36v2 domain scores than male patients. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings offer specific, valuable insight into the psychosocial burden of HAE with the potential to improve clinical management of HAE. Best practices for effective management of HAE should include providing holistic care to address the psychosocial and mental health of HAE patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergy Asthma and Clinical ImmunologySame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207