MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173234734 · doi:10.1177/20514158211023708

Wild-type ATTR amyloidosis of the prostate: a case review

2021· review· en· W3173234734 on OpenAlexaff
Russell Sterrett, Arleigh McCurdy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Urology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransthyretinAmyloidosisMedicineProstateAmyloid (mycology)ProstatectomyPathologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The amyloidoses are a rare group of disorders caused by the deposition of amyloid fibrils in organ tissues. Transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis is a subcategory of amyloidosis, which can be further subdivided into hereditary transthyretin-mediated or wild-type (‘senile’) amyloidosis. Involvement of the prostate by any type of amyloidosis is rare, with only a handful of cases reported in the literature. We report here a case of a 64-year-old Caucasian man who was incidentally found to have wild-type transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis of the prostate following a radical prostatectomy for treatment of a localised, Gleason 7 (4 + 3) adenocarcinoma of the prostate. TTR subtyping was confirmed by mass spectrometry. His family history was negative for known amyloidosis, and sequencing of the entire TTR gene was negative for any mutations, so he was therefore considered to have wild-type TTR amyloidosis. He was subsequently found to have additional foci of amyloid deposition in the gastrointestinal tract. Wild-type transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis as an incidental finding in a prostate biopsy is an extremely rare finding. Treatment options for transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis are limited, and further research and treatment options are needed in this rare and difficult to manage disease. Level of evidence: The level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine levels of evidence is not applicable to this case report. Given that this is a rare entity, decisions made in managing this case were based on a level of evidence of 5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical UrologySame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207