Energy-Efficient Precoding Designs for Multi-User Visible Light Communication Systems With Confidential Messages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies energy-efficient precoding designs for multi-user visible light communication (VLC) systems from the perspective of physical layer security where users’ messages must be kept mutually confidential. For such systems, we first derive a lower bound on the achievable secrecy rate of each user. Next, the total power consumption for illumination and data transmission is thoroughly analyzed. We then tackle the problem of maximizing energy efficiency, given that each user’s secrecy rate satisfies a certain threshold. The design problem is shown to be non-convex fractional programming, which renders finding the optimal solution computationally prohibitive. Our aim in this paper is, therefore, to find sub-optimal yet low complexity solutions. For this purpose, the traditional Dinkelbach algorithm is first employed to reformulate the original problem to a non-fractional parameterized one. Two different approaches based on the convex-concave procedure (CCCP) and Semidefinite Relaxation (SDR) are utilized to solve the non-convex parameterized problem. In addition, to further reduce the complexity, we investigate a design using the zero-forcing (ZF) technique. Numerical results are conducted to show the feasibility, convergence, and performance of the proposed algorithms depending on different parameters of the system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".