Treatment with High-Dose Prednisolone in Vigabatrin-Refractory Infantile Spasms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This research aimed to study the short-term seizure outcomes following treatment with 8 mg/kg/day prednisolone in children with infantile spasms (IS) refractory to vigabatrin. We hypothesized that high-dose prednisolone may result in similar rates of electroclinical remission when compared to published ACTH rates. METHODS: All consecutive children with hypsarrhythmia or hypsarrhythmia variant on EEG with/without IS, who had been treated with vigabatrin as first-line anti-seizure medication (ASM) followed by high-dose oral prednisolone (8 mg/kg/day; maximum 60 mg/day) in cases who did not respond to vigabatrin, were included. Clinical and electroclinical response (ECR) at 2 weeks following initiation of treatment and adverse effects were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-five children were included. A genetic etiology was seen in 38.5% cases. Complete ECR was seen in 30.8% (20/65) of the patients 2 weeks after vigabatrin. Complete ECR was noted in 77.8% (35/45) of the patients, 2 weeks after prednisolone initiation in children who failed vigabatrin, and this was sustained at 6 weeks in 66.7% (30/45) patients. Prednisolone was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose (8 mg/kg/day) oral prednisolone resulted in sustained complete ECR (at 6 weeks) in two-thirds of the children with hypsarrhythmia or hypsarrhythmia variant on EEG with/without parentally reported IS. It was generally well tolerated and found to be safe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".