What Do Nurses Prefer? A Cross-sectional Study of Catheter Preference After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine nursing preferences regarding catheter type (transurethral indwelling catheters vs intermittent catheterization vs suprapubic tube drainage) when caring for patients in hospital after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Registered nurses practicing in academic and community hospitals across North America (the United States and Canada). METHODS: Three hundred fifty-four RNs who routinely care for patients after pelvic organ prolapse surgery from centers across North America were sent an electronic survey between February 2018 and March 2019. The survey comprised 24 questions that collected information on the participants' demographics and their experience with using different catheters in a hospital setting, along with knowledge of and preference for the different catheter types. Descriptive statistics were used to determine catheter preferences of respondents in addition to their catheter rankings according to catheter-related outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred sixty nurses completed the survey, representing a 45% response rate. More than half (63.1%, n = 101) of respondents stated a preference for transurethral indwelling catheters, 23.1% (n = 37) preferred suprapubic tubes, and 10.6% (n = 17) preferred intermittent catheterization. Transurethral indwelling catheters were ranked by nurses as the best catheter type for ease of use and pain/discomfort for patients. Intermittent catheterization was ranked by nurses as the best for lowest malfunction rates and return of bladder function. Suprapubic tubes were ranked by nurses as best for lowest infection rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that nurses practicing in inpatient care units have a strong preference for transurethral indwelling catheters over intermittent catheterization and suprapubic tubes when caring for patients after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".