MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus. Gender specific changes in pulmonary function in 1 year old rats after neonatal hyperoxia exposure

2018· article· en· W3173401497 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Braun, David F. Pegelow, Kara N. Goss, Marlowe Eldridge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaHyperoxiaMedicineLungPulmonary function testingPulmonary complianceOxygen toxicityCOPDAirway resistancePhysiologyInternal medicinePregnancyGestational ageBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale Preterm birth affects about 11% of pregnancies worldwide. The Institute of Medicine estimated the cost associated with premature birth to be $36 billion in 2016. Lungs in preterm infants are in the critical saccular stage of lung development and susceptible to the oxygen‐induced chronic lung disease known as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). BPD is characterized by functional abnormalities including decreased saccular/alveolar septation, decreased microvascular cross‐sectional area with or without pulmonary hypertension, airway injury with or without increased airway reactivity, and abnormalities of control of breathing in various combinations. While the initial inflammation improves, chronic inflammation ensues for a long time. We tested how neonatal hyperoxia exposure affects lung function one year after birth. We postulated an increase in lung collagen levels reflected by reduced pulmonary function. Methods 6 newborn male and female rats in each group were exposed to Hyperoxia (Hx; 85% O 2 ) or Normoxia (Nx; 21% O 2 ) for 14 days, then aged to 1 year in Nx. At one year, lung function was measured using a FlexiVent (Scireq, Montreal, Canada). Using a single frequency forced oscillation manoeuvre and a low‐frequency forced oscillation technique the lung was tested for compliance and resistance. Total lung collagen was determined by a colorimetric assay using Ehrlich's reagent. Results Analysis of one year old rats showed no difference in weight and body length between the Nx and the Hx group within each gender. The inspiratory capacity (IC) was significantly higher in the Hx exposed male rats compared to the Nx exposed male rats (12.6±0.6 ml vs 14.0±0.9 ml; p=0.02). The difference in IC in female rats was significantly lower in the Hx group compared to the Nx group (11.3±0.4 vs 10.1±0.6 ml; p=0.002). Dynamic compliance was significantly increased in the male Hx group compared to the male Nx group (1.43±0.05 vs 1.61±0.11 ml/cm H 2 O; p=0.04). In contrast, the female Hx group showed significantly reduced compliance compared to the female Nx group (1.32±0.05 vs 1.15±0.17 ml/cm H 2 O). In addition, the PV loop area was higher in the male Hx group compared to the male Nx group and no difference was found between the two female groups. Total collagen in lung tissue was not different between the male Hx and Nx groups but was higher in the female Hx compared to the Nx group. Conclusion One year after neonatal Hx exposure, the male lung shows increased compliance and inspiratory capacity compared to the Nx exposed rats suggesting a trend to emphysema. In contrast, female rats show signs of lung fibrosis reflected by reduced compliance and increased total collagen content. This data suggests that neonatal oxygen exposure initiates alterations in inflammatory and repair pathways that are different between male and female rats. Support or Funding Information NHLBI: R01 HL115061‐01 (Eldridge) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→