MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Administration of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Does Not Modulate Sweating or Cutaneous Vasodilation in Young Men Exercising in the Heat

2018· article· en· W3173419778 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gregory W. McGarr, Naoto Fujii, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfrared Thermography in Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAtrial natriuretic peptideMedicineVasodilationInternal medicineEndocrinologyThermoregulationMicrodialysisVenous return curveHemodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is a hormone secreted by cardiac muscle cells in response to increases in right atrial pressure, which can occur due to changes in blood pressure and blood volume. This hormone is also secreted during acute exercise in both temperate and hot environments and may be released into the blood due to the effects of increased venous return on the heart caused by active muscle contraction under these conditions. However, ANP release is diminished during prolonged exercise, which may ultimately impair heat loss if its release is linked to alterations in cutaneous blood flow and sweating. The current evidence is mixed with respect to a direct role of ANP in modulating cutaneous vasodilation and sweating responses, with some studies demonstrating an effect of exogenous ANP infusion in augmenting these heat loss responses, while others have failed to show any influence of the hormone. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of intradermal administration of varying doses of ANP on cutaneous vasodilation and sweating responses in healthy habitually active young men exercising in a hot environment. Ten healthy young males (27 ± 6 years) exercised for 50 min at ~55% VO 2peak in the heat (35°C, 20% relative humidity). Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC, measured via laser Doppler flowmetry) and sweating (measured via ventilated capsules) were assessed at four dorsal forearm skin sites receiving either lactated Ringer's solution (Control) or one of three ANP doses (0.1 μM, 1.0 μM, 10 μM) via microdialysis. At the end of exercise, CVC was not different between Control (73 ± 14% CVC max ) and 0.1 μM (66 ± 20% CVC max ), 1.0 μM (69 ± 21% CVC max ), or 10 μM (71 ± 18% CVC max ) ANP sites (all P > 0.05). Similarly, sweat rates were not different between Control (1.37 ± 0.43 mg/min/cm 2 ) and 0.1 μM (1.43 ± 0.55 mg/min/cm2), 1.0 μM (1.44 ± 0.41 mg/min/cm2), or 10 μM (1.36 ± 0.37 mg/min/cm2) ANP sites (all P > 0.05). In summary, these results demonstrate that in healthy habitually active young men, intradermal administration of ANP does not augment cutaneous vasodilation or sweating during exercise in the heat. Such findings may indicate that ANP does not have a direct effect on these heat loss responses. Alternatively, it may be the case that endogenous levels of ANP produced under these conditions are sufficient to elicit a maximal effect of the hormone on cutaneous blood flow and sweating in healthy young men, thus masking any direct effects of exogenous administration. Support or Funding Information Funding support: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (held by Dr. Kenny). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicInfrared Thermography in MedicineFrench-language works237,207