MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hydrogen‐Deuterium exchange reveals distinct activation states of PLCβ2 by G‐proteins

2018· article· en· W3173492544 on OpenAlexaff
Isaac J. Fisher, Meredith L. Jenkins, Gregory G. Tall, John E. Burke, Alan V. Smrcka

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPhospholipase CGq alpha subunitChemistryDiacylglycerol kinaseG proteinPleckstrin homology domainPhosphatidylinositolG protein-coupled receptorHydrogen–deuterium exchangeReceptorStereochemistryBiochemistrySignal transductionProtein kinase C

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are an important class of cell surface receptors that transduce extracellular stimuli to intracellular signaling events via G‐proteins. One major effector of G proteins is phospholipase C (PLC), which hydrolyzes Phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate (PIP 2 ) into Diacylglycerol (DAG) and Inositol 1,4,5, trisphosphate (IP 3 ). PLCβ2 and PLCβ3 isoforms are directly activated by binding Gα q , Gβγ or both. The mechanism of activation of PLCβ2 by Gβγ is unknown, and the binding site(s) for Gβγ on PLCβ remain controversial. Here, we use hydrogen‐deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDXMS) to understand the conformational dynamics of PLCβ and to answer open questions in the field concerning the mechanism of activation of PLC by Gβγ and Gα q . For these experiments, several complexes were examined with HDXMS: PLCβ2 alone, PLCβ2+ PIP 2 /Phosphoethanolamine (PE)/Phosphatidylserine (PS) vesicles, or PLCβ2+ PIP 2 /PE/PS vesicles plus Gβγ or Gα q ‐AlF 4 . Incubation of PLCβ2 with PIP 2 /PE/PS vesicles strongly protects regions in the C‐terminus, confirming that this region is involved in membrane binding. In the presence of Gα q ‐AlF 4 , PLCβ2 shows protection from deuterium exchange in the helix‐loop‐helix region of the proximal C‐terminal domain (CTD) and the EF‐hand domain on PLCβ2 that exactly correspond to regions shown to interact with Gα q in the Gα q ‐PLCβ3 crystal structure. These data validate that our approach accurately reports bona fide protein‐protein and protein‐lipid interactions. Incubation of Gβγ with PLCβ2 does not reveal any regions of strong protection, but rather causes strong increases in deuterium exchange in the of the CTD of PLCβ2, indicating that the CTD of PLC undergoes a large conformational rearrangement upon Gβγ binding. This increase in deuterium exchange of the CTD of PLC is not seen upon Gα q activation. This indicates that there are distinct conformational states of PLCβ induced by Gα q and Gβγ interactions, suggesting that Gα q and Gβγ use different mechanisms for activation of PLCβ. Finally, these data suggest a mechanism for activation of PLC by Gβγ, where Gβγ binding to PLC breaks an autoinhibitory interaction involving the CTD of PLC and either the membrane or another portion of PLCβ2. Support or Funding Information This work is supported by NIH R01 GM081772 to AVS. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingFrench-language works237,207