Intrapartum cesarean delivery and the risk of perinatal complications in women with and without a single prior cesarean delivery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine maternal and neonatal complications associated with an intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) with and without a history of a previous CD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent an unplanned intrapartum CD following a trial of labor in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital, between 2009 and 2016. Perinatal outcomes of women with and without a history of a previous CD were compared. Composite adverse maternal outcome included one or more of the following: postpartum hemorrhage, need for blood transfusion, or cesarean hysterectomy. Composite adverse neonatal outcome included one or more of the following: 5-min Apgar score <7, neonatal seizure, need for intubation, meconium-aspiration-syndrome, or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. RESULTS: During the study period, 42 275 women attempted vaginal delivery. Of them, 2229 (5.3%) women underwent an unplanned intrapartum CD and met inclusion criteria: 337 (15.1%) with (study group) and 1892 (84.9%) without (control group) a previous CD. Women without a previous CD were younger and were characterized by higher rates of nulliparity and induction of labor compared with women with a previous CD. Other demographic and obstetrical characteristics did not differ between the groups. Indications for CD were also comparable between the groups. Uterine rupture complicated 2.3% of trials of labor among women with a previous CD. Adverse maternal (2.7% vs 2.9%, P = 1.0) and neonatal (3.9% vs 4.3%, P = 0.88) outcomes were comparable between the groups. After adjusting for potential confounders, a previous CD was not associated independently with adverse maternal outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-2.38; P = 0.78) or neonatal outcomes (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.36-1.75; P = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that perinatal outcomes of intrapartum CD delivery among women with a previous CD do not differ from those in women without a previous CD. These findings might improve the consultation and informed decision-making process for couples considering a trial of labor after CD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".