Antifungal susceptibilities of opportunistic filamentous fungal pathogens from the Asia and Western Pacific Region: data from the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program (2011–2019)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Antifungal surveillance is an important tool to monitor the prevalence of uncommon fungal species and increasing antifungal resistance throughout the world, but data comparing results across several different Asian countries are scarce. In this study, 372 invasive molds collected in the Asia-Western Pacific region in 2011–2019 were susceptibility tested for mold-active triazoles (isavuconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole). The collection includes 318 Aspergillus spp. isolates and 53 non- Aspergillus molds. The MIC values using CLSI methods for isavuconazole versus Aspergillus fumigatus ranged from 0.25 to 2 mg l −1 . Isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole acted similarly against A. fumigatus . The mold-active triazoles exhibited a wildtype phenotype to most of the Aspergillus spp. isolates tested (>94%), but poor activity against Fusarium solani species complex and Lomentospora prolificans . Voriconazole was most active against the Scedosporium spp. and posaconazole was most active against the Mucorales. In summary, isavuconazole displayed excellent activity against most species of Aspergillus and was comparable to other mold-active triazoles against non- Aspergillus molds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".