Structural Analysis of Social Capital: Institution, Relations, and Order1/ ANALYSE STRUCTURELLE DU CAPITAL SOCIAL: L'INSTITUTION, LES RELATIONS ET L'ORDRE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Current studies on are both broad and in-depth in terms of contents and forms as well. The among various forms, however, seems to be a sort of in disorder, without establishing a institution with a relatively clear dividing line. This paper believes that doesn't include microscopic forms of trust, norm, and network, etc only. We, through in-depth studies from macro-structure aspect, could discover that in fact exists in three broader fields of institution, relations, and order. institution, relations, and order are essentially initial state of capital. Every specific form of is unexceptionally result of interrelation and interaction among these three. Every single form of doesn't purely belong to a certain field; it closely relates to other fields instead. And it even is combination of multiple-form capital. Both structural and resource natures of thread together instead of being discrete. Keywords: capital; institution; relations; and order Resume: Les etudes actuelles sur le sont a la fois larges et profondes en termes de contenu et des formes. La des formes diverses, cependant, semble etre une sorte de desordre, sans une ligne de demarcation relativement claire. Ce document estime que le n'inclut pas de formes microscopiques de confiance, ni de normes, ni de reseaux. A travers des etudes en profondeur a partir des aspects macro-structurels, nous avons pu decouvrir que le existe en fait dans trois domaines plus larges, c'est-a-dire l'institution sociale, les relations sociales et l'ordre social. L'institution sociale, les relations sociales et l'ordre sont essentiellement l'etat initial du social. Chaque forme specifique de est sans exception le resultat de l'inter-relation et l'interaction entre ces trois. Toute forme unique du n'appartient pas purement a un certain domaine, par contre, elle est etroitement liee a d'autres domaines. Et elle peut meme etre la combinaison de multiples formes de social. Au lieu d'etre isolees, la nature structurelle et les ressources du sont liees. Mots-cles: social, institution sociale, relations sociales, ordre THE PROPOSITION OF THE ISSUE Bourdieu is earliest scholar introducing concept of social capital into sociology study field. In his theory, is defined as the aggregation of current or potential resources inseparable from a certain type of long-term possession of that is well known, recognized, and as well as institutionized relation network (Zhang Ziqi, 2001:54). American scientist Coleman inherited and developed research achievements. Coleman believed, Social capital's definition comes from its functionality. capitals are not a certain form of separate entity, and they are different entities with certain forms instead. There are two common features for them: they are constituted by various elements comprising of structure; and they provide convenience for individual action inside structure (Coleman, 1999: 354). There is not yet a uniform statement regarding concept of in academic circles. Alejandro Portes proposed refined and complete statement regarding capital. In his view, Social is individuals' capability to gain rare resources in or a broader Structure with their member identities. This capability is not inherent, and it is a type of asset included in relation between an individual and others. And is result of embeddedness (Portes, 1995:12-13). This paper believes that is resources that are formed by relation body1 through contacts can both introduce behaving individuals with current or potential interests and improve public interests. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".