MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173693530 · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c02505

Environmental Risks in Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Removal Using Enhanced Rock Weathering Are Overlooked

2021· article· en· W3173693530 on OpenAlexaffabout
Woo‐Jung Choi, Hyun-Jin Park, Yanjiang Cai, Scott X. Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsWeatheringLibrary sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringGeochemistryGeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVViewpointNEXTEnvironmental Risks in Atmospheric CO2 Removal Using Enhanced Rock Weathering Are OverlookedWoo-Jung ChoiWoo-Jung ChoiDepartment of Rural & Bio-Systems Engineering (BK 21), Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of KoreaMore by Woo-Jung Choi, Hyun-Jin ParkHyun-Jin ParkDepartment of Rural & Bio-Systems Engineering (BK 21), Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of KoreaMore by Hyun-Jin Park, Yanjiang CaiYanjiang CaiState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, ChinaMore by Yanjiang Cai, and Scott X Chang*Scott X ChangState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, ChinaDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada*Email: [email protected]More by Scott X ChangView Biographyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-439XCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 14, 9627–9629Publication Date (Web):June 29, 2021Publication History Received16 April 2021Published online29 June 2021Published inissue 20 July 2021https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c02505https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02505article-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2021 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views4107Altmetric-Citations4LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (2 MB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Carbon,Inorganic carbon compounds,Materials,Platinum,Soils Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207