MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract CT038: Kinetics of radiographic response for tebentafusp (tebe) in previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients (pts) achieving prolonged survival

2021· article· en· W3173760515 on OpenAlexaff
Marcus O. Butler, Takami Sato, Richard D. Carvajal, Joseph J. Sacco, Shaad E. Abdullah, Chris Holland, Howard Goodall, Alexander N. Shoushtari

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsInternal medicinePost-hoc analysisProgressive diseaseInterim analysisGastroenterologyProgression-free survivalPhases of clinical researchNuclear medicineMelanomaOverall survivalOncologySurgeryClinical trialDiseaseCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The phase 3 IMCgp100-202 trial (NCT03070392) (Study 202) in untreated mUM demonstrated improved overall survival (OS), HR=0.51, at the first pre-specified interim analysis. This OS benefit and the promising estimated 12-month OS rate of 62% observed in previously treated mUM pts on the phase 2 IMCgp100-102 trial (Study 102; NCT02570308) is not explained by RECIST responses alone. In this post hoc analysis of Study 102, we describe the tumor kinetics of pts with prolonged survival (OS ≥ 12 mo). Methods: 127 pts with 2L+ mUM received single agent tebe during the expansion phase of Study 102, where treatment beyond RECIST progression was permitted. Analyses of baseline (BL) and on-treatment tumor measurements, best response and time to progression used in this analysis were adjudicated by an independent radiologic committee. Results: With 19.5 mo median follow-up, 59% (75/127) of pts had OS ≥ 12 mo. Of these 75, a minority had RECIST partial response (PR: 8%; 6/75) and the rest had a best response of stable disease (SD: 57%; 43/75), progressive disease (PD: 33%; 25/75), or not evaluable (NE: 1%; 1/75). In contrast, among 41% (52/127) of pts with OS < 12 mo, 27% (14/52) had SD, 67% (35/52) had PD, and 6% were NE (3/52) as best response. Pts with OS ≥ 12 mo were more likely to have a largest liver metastasis of < 3 cm (43% vs 23%). There were no major differences in the use of prior immunotherapy between the two OS groups. Most pts with OS ≥ 12 mo (59%; 44/75) had at least some reduction in the sum of target lesions, regardless of RECIST response. The majority of these 44 pts (64%; 28/44) had durable tumor reduction defined by PFS > 6 mo. In contrast, among OS < 12 mo pts, reduction in the sum of target lesions was infrequent (13%; 7/52), and none were durable. Most pts with tumor growth as best change in target lesions had OS <12 mo (58%; 38/65) compared to OS ≥ 12 mo (42%; 27/65). Among pts with tumor growth, the median BL tumor burden was lower and the rate of increase over time was slower for pts with OS ≥ 12 mo (BL: 59 mm, W8: 68 mm, W16: 68 mm) compared to pts with OS < 12 mo (BL: 113 mm, W8: 129 mm, W16: 143 mm). Interestingly, 42% (25/60) of pts with best response of PD had OS ≥ 12 mo including 4 pts with evidence of tumor shrinkage at 6 months or later. The reason for PD (new lesions or growth in index lesions) was comparable between both OS groups. More pts continued treatment beyond progression in the OS ≥ 12 (81%) compared to OS < 12 mo (56%). Conclusion: Analysis of tumor kinetics while on tebe, the first TCR bispecific to report an OS benefit in a solid tumor, suggests most pts with OS ≥ 12 mo are best described by a new type of immune-related response characterized by durable tumor reduction and slowing rate of tumor growth. RECIST responses therefore capture a minority of patients with OS ≥ 12 mo, while just under half of pts with RECIST PD still had promising OS. Citation Format: Marcus O. Butler, Takami Sato, Richard D. Carvajal, Joseph J. Sacco, Shaad E. Abdullah, Chris Holland, Howard Goodall, Alexander N. Shoushtari. Kinetics of radiographic response for tebentafusp (tebe) in previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients (pts) achieving prolonged survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT038.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207