Case report: Anatomic variant of forearm arteries and its clinical correlation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methods Traditional macro‐micro dissections of 30 upper limbs from 15 embalmed cadavers of both sexes and of different ages were performed. Summary of results: An atypical course and branching pattern of forearm vessels was found unilaterally in one male cadaver. The ulnar artery originated as one of the two terminal branches of the brachial artery and was significantly smaller than commonly seen. It descended superficially, covered only by the skin and the anterbrachial fascia. The branching pattern of the radial artery was also atypical. A common interosseous artery which typically arises from the ulnar artery, in this case emerged as a short branch of the radial artery distal to the radial tuberosity. While passing toward the interosseous membrane, the common interosseous artery was separated from the median and anterior interosseous nerves by the ulnar head of the pronator teres muscle and branched out into the anterior and posterior interosseous and ulnar recurrent arteries that supply the major part of the anterior forearm region. Conclusion This anatomical variant of forearm arteries should be considered in diagnosis and treatment since it could complicate radiographic, surgical, and orthopaedic procedures in the forearm, such as radial artery screening for grafting purposes, ligation of a lacerated radial or ulnar artery, and assessment of forearm vessels by color Doppler ultrasonography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".