Successful Management of Significant Maternal 3 Beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Deficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a case of successful management of pregnancy in a patient with significant 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3beta-HSD) deficiency. A 25-year-old female presented for interfertility evaluation after failure to conceive for 8 months. The patient began full menses each month at the time of ovulation. Her unique clinical presentation led to the diagnosis of a significant 3beta-HSD deficiency. Treatment for infertility with clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, dexamethasone and human chorionic gonadotropin trigger was unsuccessful. The patient conceived spontaneously while taking continuous combination oral contraceptive pills. Due to her history of instability and full menses in the luteal phase, oral estrogen and progesterone in oil were administered to support the early pregnancy. The results of elevated 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and ratio of 17 OH-pregnenolone to 17-OHP were consistent with diagnosis of significant 3beta-HSD deficiency. Successful pregnancy was achieved after exogenous hormone supplementation. Fertility in 3beta-HSD deficiency, a rare form of congenital adrenal hyperplasia, has not been extensively studied. Varying phenotype can make the diagnosis challenging. Heightened suspicion in patients with reported bleeding at ovulation or breakthrough bleeding on oral contraceptive pills could aid in the diagnosis. Successful pregnancy in these patients is possible. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2021;10(2):51-54 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo730
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".