THE PRISONER OF WAR AND HIS CHILDREN: EVIDENCE FOR THE ORIGIN OF SECOND GENERATIONAL EFFECTS OF CAPTIVITY*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among the many scientific investigations which have documented the long-term effects of the stresses of captivity upon the health and adjustment of returned prisoners of war, two interrelated, but uncon firmed, themes persist: (a) that the stresses of internment affect the parent-child relationship, and (b) that the detrimental effects of internment may be extended to another generation. The present study was initiated to determine the relationship between the stresses experienced by the parent during his captivity and the nature of his relationship with his children after release. This study focuses on data longitudinally collected on 42 families of returned prisoners of the Vietnam War and attempts to identify the combination of factors which may be used to explain the variability in the quality of the father-child relationship subsequent to the father's release from prison. The findings, which indicated a significant relationship between the stresses of captivity and the subsequent father-child relationship, are discussed in terms of their relevance to the Canadian studies of German concentration camp victims which have led to the evolution of theoretical constructs to explain the phenomenon of second generational effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".