MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Spinal Cord Injury and Chronically Induced Orthostatic Hypotension on Left Ventricular Contractility and Stiffness

2019· article· en· W3173871089 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Brian Hayes, Malihe‐Sedat Poormasjedi‐Meibod, Mary Fossey, Erin Erskine, Rishi Gupta, David J. Granville, Aaron A. Phillips, Christopher R. West

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineContractilitySpinal cord injuryOrthostatic vital signsCardiologyInternal medicineStroke volumeVentricleHemodynamicsAnesthesiaBlood pressureDiastoleCardiac function curveSpinal cordHeart rateHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Complete spinal cord injury (SCI) above the T3 spinal level is associated impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function. However, the effect on diastolic structure and function has yet to be examined. Furthermore, high thoracic SCI impairs centrally‐derived cardiovascular responses to postural change, leading to the development of orthostatic hypotension (OH) post‐SCI. While it has been demonstrated that these frequent bouts of OH cause impairments in cerebrovascular function, it is not known whether this hemodynamic instability also impairs cardiac function. Methods This study examined the effect of SCI on LV systolic and diastolic function in the presence or absence of daily bouts of acutely induced OH. 22 rats were divided into four groups: 1. Rats with a sham injury and no daily OH (SHAM, n=5), 2. Rats with a sham injury and daily induced OH (SHAM‐OH, n=6), 3. Rats with a complete T3 transection injury and daily induced OH (T3‐OH, n=5), 4. Rats with a complete T3 transection and no daily OH (T3‐SCI, n=6). 9 weeks after surgery, LV pressure‐volume (PV) catheterization was performed to assess LV basal PV indices, as well as cardiac contractility and stiffness. Furthermore, the coupling of the arterial system and the left ventricle was characterized to examine the influence of SCI and/or OH on the efficiency of the interaction between the LV and arterial system. Results Compared to both SHAM and SHAM‐OH, the T3‐SCI and T3‐OH groups experienced significant reductions in systolic blood pressure, LV stroke work and cardiac output (all p < 0.023). The T3‐OH group demonstrated an increase in arterial elastance compared to both the SHAM‐OH and SHAM groups (p < 0.014). T3‐SCI and T3‐OH groups exhibited reduced end‐systolic elastance compared to both SHAM and SHAM‐OH (p < 0.04). No difference was found in LV stiffness between the four groups. Finally, the ratio of ventricular‐vascular coupling was found to be significantly increased in the T3‐OH group compared to all other groups (all P< 0.019). Conclusion Complete high thoracic and cervical SCI causes a reduction in LV contractile function. Combined high thoracic SCI and daily OH impairs ventricular‐vascular coupling via changes in arterial compliance. Support or Funding Information Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC), International Collaborations on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Blusson Integrated Cures Partnership (BICP). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207