MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

INCREASING LEPTIN SENSITIVITY VIA PTP1B DELETION DOES NOT INCREASE BLOOD PRESSURE THROUGH AN INCREASED SYMPATHETIC TONE IN MICE ON A BALB/C BACKGROUND

2013· article· en· W3173931092 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Butler, J Norman, Michel L. Tremblay, Eric J. Belin de Chantemèle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyLeptinPhenylephrineMedicineBlood pressureBALB/cStimulationAdrenergicChemistryReceptorImmune systemImmunologyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) is a molecular brake on the leptin signaling pathway. Deletion of PTP1B increases leptin sensitivity and triggers hypertension in mice on a Balb/C background but not on a C57Bl/6 background. While leptin increases sympathetic tone (ST), whether PTP1B deletion differently increases ST in Balb/C and C57Bl/6 mice remains to be determined. To test the hypothesis that PTP1B deletion increases sympathetic tone in mice on the Balb/C background only, male and female wild‐type (WT) and knockout (KO) mice from both backgrounds were instrumented with jugular and carotid catheters to measure mean arterial pressure response to ganglionic blockade (mecamylamine) and adrenergic stimulation (phenylephrine). On the Balb/C background, PTP1B deletion increases sympathetic tone and reduces vascular adrenergic tone in both male (WT: −39±3% vs KO: −43±4%) and female mice (WT: −34±5% vs KO: − 35±4%). PTP1B deletion similarly increased ST in KO mice on the C57Bl/6 background (WT: 76±8% vs KO: 129±41%) but did not affect their adrenergic tone. Furthermore, in WT animals, sympathetic tone was higher in C57Bl/6 compared to Balb/c mice. Together these data suggest that the hypertension observed in PTP1B KO mice on the Balb/c background cannot be explained by an enhanced sympathetic tone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity→French-language works237,207→