MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173958355 · doi:10.31603/ce.4422

Pemberdayaan UMKM Wilayah Bandongan melalui Sistem Informasi Lazismu Berbasis Web

2021· article· id· W3173958355 on OpenAlexaff
Maimunah Maimunah, Iqbal Farhan Ikhsan, Naufal Ammar Zada, Maulina Rizky Anggraeni, Aulia Maharani Hermantyo, Annisa Ari Azzahra

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunity Empowerment · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Potensi UMKM di wilayah Kecamatan Bandongan Kabupaten Magelang cukup tinggi. Hal ini mendorong Lazismu Bandongan turut berperan serta dalam pemberdayaan dan peningkatan kesejahteraan UMKM yang dituangkan dalam program kerjanya. Aplikasi Mitramu merupakan aplikasi mobile milik Lazismu Bandongan yang digunakan untuk mempermudah para pemilik UMKM di wilayah Magelang khususnya di Bandongan untuk memasarkan hasil produknya. Pemberdayaan UMKM yang dilakukan Lazismu masih terkendala diantaranya data mitra UMKM yang ada di aplikasi Mitramu masih sedikit sehingga informasi potensi UMKM menjadi kurang lengkap. Melalui kegiatan PPMT Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang bersama Lazismu Bandongan melakukan kegiatan pemberdayaan UMKM. Kegiatan yang dilakukan meliputi pemetaan potensi UMKM dengan melakukan kegiatan survei di beberapa dusun di wilayah Bandongan. Hasil data survei dimuat dalam menu katalog aplikasi Mitramu. Selain itu, untuk mendukung eksistensi Lazismu maka dibuat sistem informasi Lazismu berbasis web yang berfungsi sebagai company profile. Melalui company profile tersebut maka akan memudahkan bagi Lazismu dalam memberikan informasi bagi masyarakat termasuk bagi UMKM sehingga menjadi tidak ragu sebagai mitra Lazismu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunity EmpowermentSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207