MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Exercise Training and TrkB blockade on Cardiac BDNF‐TrkB signaling post Myocardial Infarction in Rats

2018· article· en· W3173958901 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Heow Won Lee, Monir Ahmad, Hongwei Wang, Frans H. H. Leenen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsTropomyosin receptor kinase BInternal medicineMedicineCardiologyBrain-derived neurotrophic factorVentricleMyocardial infarctionPreloadsedEndocrinologyEjection fractionCardiac function curveNeurotrophic factorsHeart failureReceptorHemodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Exercise training post myocardial infarction (MI) is beneficial for preserving cardiac function, but underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Exercise increases brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the non‐infarct area of the left ventricle (LV) with an improvement of ejection fraction (EF) and LV end‐diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Whether these effects are mediated by downstream pathways of BDNF via its binding receptor tropomyosin‐related kinase B receptor (TrkB) has not yet been assessed. Therefore, impact of exercise training post MI on cardiac function and one of downstream effectors of BDNF‐TrkB signaling, Ca 2+ /calmodulin dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), were investigated in exercising rats treated with vehicle or TrkB blocker, ANA‐12. Methods After sham surgery (n=10) or ligation of coronary artery, surviving MI rats were divided into 3 groups: sedentary MI with vehicle (Sed‐MI‐Veh, n=17), exercise MI with vehicle (ExT‐MI‐Veh, n=17) and exercise MI with ANA‐12 (ExT‐MI‐ANA‐12, n=7). Exercise training was done for 4 weeks (5 days/week) on a motor‐driven treadmill with or without ANA‐12 (0.5 mg/kg). At the end, LV function was evaluated by echocardiography and Millar catheter, and mature BDNF (mBDNF), phospho‐CaMKII (p‐CaMKII) and CaMKII (pan) levels were assessed in the non‐infarct area of the LV by Western blotting. Results MI size was similar among the MI groups. ExT‐MI‐Veh showed higher EF compared to Sed‐MI‐Veh (63 ± 2 vs. 54 ± 2%, ExT‐MI‐Veh vs. Sed‐MI‐Veh). Exercise‐induced improvement of EF was inhibited by ANA‐12 (56 ± 2%). LVEDP was significantly lower in exercise MI groups (11.6 ± 0.9 and 12.8 ± 1.6 mmHg, Veh and ANA‐12) compared to Sed‐MI‐Veh (18.4 ± 0.9 mmHg). After MI, p‐CaMKII and p‐CaMKII/CaMKII (pan) were significantly decreased (0.6 ± 0.04 and 0.5 ± 0.1, fold of Sham, respectively). Exercise increased mBDNF (0.9 ± 0.1 vs. 0.7 ± 0.1 vs. fold of Sham, ExT‐MI‐Veh vs. Sed‐MI‐Veh) and p‐CaMKII (0.8 ± 0.1, fold of Sham). ANA‐12 prevented exercise‐induced increases in mBDNF (0.6 ± 0.1, fold of Sham) and p‐CaMKII (0.6 ± 0.1, fold of Sham). Conclusions : Exercise post MI increases EF and decreases LVEDP, but TrkB blockade only inhibits the improvement of EF, but not of LVEDP. Exercise increases mBDNF and p‐CaMKII in the non‐infarct area of the LV, which are attenuated by ANA‐12. This indicates that exercise‐induced improvement of EF is mediated by TrkB and downstream effector CaMKII, and BDNF‐TrkB signaling may be mainly associated with improvement in systolic function by exercise training. Support or Funding Information FRN:MOP‐136923 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207