Altered thermal and metabolic control in newborn rats at high altitude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In acute hypoxia, newborn reduce oxygen consumption (VO2) and rectal temperature (Tr), but it remains unclear if these responses are maintained in chronic hypoxia. We used rats living at high altitude (3600 m, La Paz Bolivia) at postnatal days 7–8 (P7, n=5, body weight 13±1 g) and 15–16 (P15, n=6, 21±1 g). Tr and VO2 were measured in 21%O2 (room air), 35%O2 (sea level PO2), and 10%O2 (hypoxia), during 20 minutes each. Ambient temperature (Ta) was 34°C at P7 and 30°C at P15. Tr‐Ta was used as an index of thermoregulatory control. At P7, Tr‐Ta was −0.1±0.2°C, suggesting that thermoregulatory control is not established. In 35%O2, Tr was 34.8±0.2°C, and 32.0±0.6°C in 10%O2. At P15, Tr‐Ta was 5.2±0.2°C in room air, Tr did not increased in 35%O2, and was 31.8±0.4°C in 10%O2. VO2 was high (P7=8.6±0.8; P15=9.4±0.4 ml/min/100g) compared to sea level rats (5 ml/min/100g in 20g P10 rats). In P7 and P15 rats, VO2 increased in 35%O2 and dropped in 10%O2. Our results suggest that chronic hypoxia delays the establishment of thermoregulation and increases metabolic rate in newborn rats. The drop of Tr and VO2 in 10%O2 were however well maintained. Founded by NSERC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".