The Relationship Between Perioperative Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation and Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and neurologic deficit continues to be an important neuropsychological adverse affecting patients' outcome. We conducted this systematic review to investigate the relationship between regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) and early POCD in postoperative patients. Materials and Methods: Our search included MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane library, from inception to October 31, 2018. We included studies reporting values of rSO2 at the beginning of and/or during surgery, and the primary outcome was POCD, and excluded articles who do not put postoperative cognitive function as the main observation. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the included articles using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and extracted the data. Results: Seven prospective cohort studies that included 532 patients incorporate into this systematic review. About 37.78% (201/532) patients achieved POCD. POCD was associated with significantly lower overall values of rSO2 during surgery compared to the population that did not achieve POCD (mean difference [MD] −1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] −3.30 to −0.66; P = 0.003). In the subgroup, the lowest rSO2 values intraoperative period were a better predictor of POCD (MD −2.91; 95% CI −4.37 to − 1.46; P
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.016 | 0.022 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".