MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3174043310 · doi:10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.wp3

Abstract WP3: Predictors and Outcomes of Successful First Pass in Neurothrombectomy- Insights From the STAR Collaboration

2020· article· en· W3174043310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eyad Almallouhi, Sami Al Kasab, Ali Alawieh, Reda Chalhoub, Mohammad Anadani, Adam S Arthur, Joon‐Tae Kim, Reade De Leacy, Marios Psychogios, Ansaar Rai, Salah Keyrouz, Kyle M Fargen, Travis M. Dumont, Peter Kan, Robert M. Starke, Alejandro M Spiotta

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisStroke (engine)Logistic regressionInternal medicineOcclusionCerebral infarctionCardiologyEmergency medicineSurgeryMyocardial infarctionIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Shorter procedure time during neurothrombectomy is a strong predictor for good outcomes in stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. We sought to assess the predictors and outcomes of successful first pass (SFP) using multi-center investigator-initiated database. Methods: Prospectively collected neurothrombectomy data from 11 thrombectomy-capable stroke centers was combined in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR). SFP was defined by achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score≥2b with a single thrombectomy device pass. We compared the baseline characteristics, procedural metrics, rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and long-term functional outcomes between SFP and non-SFP patients. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictors of SFP and evaluate whether SFP was an independent predictor for good long-term functional outcomes (90-day mRS≤2). Results: A total of 733 SFP patients and 1134 non-SFP patients were included in this analysis. SFP patients were older (73 vs. 70, P=0.001), had higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECT) score on presentation (9 vs. 8, P=0.002). The use of Solumbra technique was an independent predictor of SFP (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, P=0.004) after controlling for age, sex, location of occlusion, National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) on presentation, intravenous alteplase (IV-tPA), and onset to groin (OTG) time. SFP was an independent predictor for good long-term functional outcomes (OR1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3, P=0.008) after controlling for age, sex, location of occlusion, NIHSS on presentation, OTG time, IV-tPA, procedure technique, and procedure duration. Conclusion: SFP lead to higher rates of functional independence in stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. These records reiterate the importance of SFP as a benchmark measure for stroke thrombectomy devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→