Child feeding practices among Mexican mothers from rural communities and WHO guiding principles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poor compliance with complementary feeding practices (CPF) has been reported previously in Mexico, but surveys have not included information on all WHO feeding recommendations. Mothers of infants <2 years old (n = 5219) were surveyed as part of the external evaluation of the Oportunidades program. CPF were assessed by questionnaire designed to solicit information in relation to the WHO guiding principles. The prevalence of malnutrition was high in the population. 61.7% infants were breastfed until 2 y of age, but the average age of introduction of foods was very young. 74.1% used fortified complementary foods, but only half of the children were receiving an adequate amount of complementary food. Only 28% of women used feeding practices considered being sensitive and responsive and 11.2% used appropriate food storage and preparation methods. Younger mothers and beneficiaries of Oportunidades are more likely to comply (p<0.05) better than the other mothers. Inadequate feeding practices were positively associated with stunting and anemia. Poor compliance with WHO recommendations is associated with poor nutritional status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".