Lymphocytosis with Smudge Cells Is Not Equivalent to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often presents with lymphocytosis and smudge cells (SCs) on routine peripheral blood (PB) tests. In some cases, these findings are assumed to be sufficient to diagnose CLL. We present a 54-year-old male who was referred for further management of progressing CLL. At the initial presentation, he looked unwell and had diffuse lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly. Blood work showed normocytic anemia (hemoglobin 72 g/L), thrombocytopenia (platelet count 74 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L), leukocytosis (white blood cell count 135.5 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L) including lymphocytosis (130.1 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L), and the presence of SCs on a PB smear. Additional workup including flow cytometry (FC), bone marrow biopsy, and lymph node biopsy led to a diagnosis of leukemic stage of advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma. Although lymphocytosis with SCs is more frequently and in higher quantities seen in CLL they are not pathognomonic and can be present in a variety of lymphoproliferative disorders. Additional diagnostic examination of cell morphology and FC to assess clonality and determine the immunotype of lymphocytes are required to establish an accurate diagnosis and determine appropriate further management of the specific disease type.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".