MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impaired Peritoneal Macrophage Function and Delayed Neutrophil Recruitment are Secondary to a Leaky Gut in JAM‐A Deficient Mice

2019· article· en· W3174223983 on OpenAlexaff
Anny‐Claude Luissint, Holly C. Williams, Wooki Kim, Sven Flemming, Verónica Azcutia, Monique N. O’Leary, Timothy L. Denning, Asma Nusrat, Charles A. Parkos

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPeritoneumZymosanInfiltration (HVAC)LipopolysaccharideInflammationTight junctionKnockout mouseConditional gene knockoutImmunologyCell biologyChemistryMedicineBiologyInternal medicinePathologyIn vitroPhenotypeBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Junctional adhesion molecule‐A (JAM‐A) is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on leukocytes, endothelia and epithelia that regulates endothelial/epithelial barrier function as well as leukocyte transendothelial/transepithelial migration. While biological roles of JAM‐A have been extensively studied with JAM‐A knockout mice ( Jam‐a KO), tissue‐specific JAM‐A deficient animals remain poorly documented. Therefore, we generated mice with tissue selective deletion of JAM‐A in myelomonocytic cells ( LysM‐cre; Jam‐a fl/fl ) and the intestinal epithelium ( Villin‐cre; Jam‐a fl/fl ). We then used an acute peritonitis model induced by intraperitoneal injection of zymosan or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to study the role of tissue selective expression of JAM‐A in recruitment of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN). Consistent with previous reports, infiltration of PMN into the peritoneum in response to zymosan or LPS was significantly reduced in Jam‐a KO versus Jam‐a WT mice. Surprisingly, in LysM‐cre; Jam‐a fl/fl , the number of PMN recruited into the peritoneum was not affected in response to zymosan nor LPS compared to control littermates, indicating that JAM‐A on PMN is not required for infiltration under such conditions. Importantly, intestinal epithelial‐selective loss of JAM‐A resulted in significant reduction of PMN infiltration in Villin‐cre; Jam‐a fl/fl mice, confirming that extrinsic factors, independent on JAM‐A expression on PMN are necessary for leukocyte recruitment to peritoneum under the conditions studied. We also observed that in response to zymosan or LPS, peritoneal macrophages from Jam‐a KO or Villin‐cre; Jam‐a fl/fl mice produced less of the chemokine CXCL1 and had reduced activity of the transcription factor NFkB. Conversely, peritoneal macrophages from LysM‐cre; Jam‐a fl/fl mice were unaffected compared to Jam‐a fl/fl mice. Given that loss of JAM‐A on intestinal epithelial cells resulted in increased intestinal permeability, we hypothesized that bacterial derived products may impair peritoneal macrophage function. Therefore, experiments were conducted with germ free Villin‐cre; Jam‐a fl/fl mice. We observed that macrophage responses as well as peritoneal recruitment of PMN in response to zymosan or LPS was not affected compared to control mice. These findings suggest that a leaky intestinal barrier and intestinal microbes are critical in regulating systemic neutrophil recruitment through effects on macrophage release of inflammatory mediators. Such observations highlight the functional link between the intestinal barrier, microbiota and the regulation of innate immune responses. Support or Funding Information NIH grants 1R01DK097256 to TLD, DK59888, DK55679 to AN and DK072564, DK061379, and DK079392 to CP. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207