195-LB: Lower Nonresponse Rates to 3-Antigen HBV Vaccine among Adults with Diabetes, Age 45 and Over, or Obesity Compared with a Single-Antigen HBV Vaccine: PROTECT Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM), older age (≥45 years) and obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) are associated with lower response to immunizations and worse outcomes of chronic hepatitis B infection. Therefore, there is a need to enhance immunogenicity of HBV vaccine for adults, especially those with DM, older age, and obesity. PROTECT study compared the immunogenicity and safety of 3-doses of 3-antigen / 3A-HBV (Sci-B-Vac) and 1-antigen / 1A-HBV (Engerix-B) HBV vaccines administered at months 0, 1 and 6. The study enrolled 1607 adults age ≥18 years in the US (42.3%), Europe (41.6%) and Canada (16.1%). Immunogenicity, measured as rate of non-response (% not achieving anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL), anti-HBs geometric mean concentration (GMC), and safety were evaluated in all adults and key subgroups of interest. Of 1607 study participants, 7.5% (3A-HBV arm) and 8.0% (1A-HBV arm) had a stable and well controlled DM (HbA1c <8.5%), 81.4% were age ≥45 years and 36.7% had BMI >30 kg/m2. Overall non-response rates were 23.5% (1A-HBV) and 8.6% (3A-HBV). For diabetics, non-response rates were 41.7% (1A-HBV) and 16.7% (3A-HBV), for those age ≥45 years, 34.3% (1A-HBV) and 16.4% (3A-HBV) and for BMI >30 kg/m2, 31.9% (1A-HBV) and 10.8% (3A-HBV). Mean GMC of anti-HBs was higher for 3A-HBV compared to 1A-HBV (1424.5 vs. 235.4 mIU/mL) and consistently higher across key subgroups, including those with DM, age ≥45 years and BMI >30 kg/m2. Safety of 3A-HBV was comparable to 1A-HBV except for higher rates of injection site pain, tenderness and myalgia of mild to moderate severity and mean duration of 1-2 days. Completion rate of all 3 vaccine doses was high at 96.8% (1A-HBV) and 95.2% (3A-HBV). Immunization with 3A-HBV achieved lower rates of non-response compared to 1A-HBV in all adults, including those with diabetes, older age, and obesity. Disclosure F. Diaz-mitoma: Consultant; Self; VBI Vaccines. Protect study group: n/a. T. Vesikari: Research Support; Self; VBI Vaccines. J. M. Langley: Research Support; Self; GlaxoSmithKline plc., Medicago, VIDO, Entos, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc., Sanofi. A. Hossain: None. N. Machluf: Employee; Self; VBI Vaccines. J. Spaans: Employee; Self; VBI Vaccines Inc. B. Yassin-rajkumar: None. D. E. Anderson: Employee; Self; VBI Vaccines, Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Self; VBI Vaccines, Inc. V. Popovic: Employee; Self; VBI Vaccines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".